FOOTBALL

USC Morning Buzz: Front Runners For Cornerback

Arizona and Michigan State have emerged as front runners recruiting former USC cornerback Ceyair Wright.

  • USC is making a push to land former Arizona State wide receiver Elijah Badger, who caught nine passes for 88 yards and a touchdown against the Trojans last season.
  • I hear Eugene “Pooh” Jeter has turned down an offer to be an assistant coach at USC. He is currently assistant general manager of the Portland G League team. Cal State Fullerton coach Dedrique Taylor has been lukewarm to USC overtures.

Eric Musselman also wanted Mississippi assistant coach Wes Flanigan, but was turned down.

  • Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine performed and spoke at a rally with student protestors outside the gates of USC on Jefferson Blvd. on Tuesday.

47 thoughts on “USC Morning Buzz: Front Runners For Cornerback”

  1. “Rage against the machine’ should be the mantra for every American boy, especially Stump as he has been wrongfully dragged through a meaningless trial by the “machine”

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  2. This ‘musical chairs’ of which footballers are going to which school is reminiscent of pro basketball where the preceding 40 minutes has little significance, just tune in for the final 8-minutes. In other words, I will wait until September to see who suits up in a Trojan uni

    Like

    Reply

  3. Europeans must be laughing at what Americans ‘take so seriously’ like the “hush money” payouts; they would think that is the normal cost of business.

    Extemists, whether left or Right, have made for dangerous times when they’ll even go after presidents

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. The repubs dragged Clinton thru an unnecessary & purely political Special Counsel Inquiry & Impeachment—but what the dems are doing today is a whole ‘nother thing…..

      #OurLegalSystemIsCirclingTheDrain…..

      #NewYorkHasIt’sOwnVersionOfCalifornia’sE.C.1101(a)&(b)….

      #…WhyIsn’tTheTrialJudgeFollowingIt,John?

      Like

      Reply

      1. MG: Jonathon Turley had an interesting you tube clip on this issue. Apparently, the defense filed a motion to exclude Daniels testimony given that it was entirely unnecessary since Trump was not denying the NDA and the testimony of Daniels was merely intended to prejudice Trump by showing that he was an adulterer. The judge denied the motion. Daniels then testified in great detail about the sex with Trump including various positions. The judge then scolded the defense for not making more objections to the salacious testimony of Daniels. Trump then asked for a mistrial based on the potential prejudice of Daniel’s testimony which the judge denied. Unbelievable. 

        Liked by 2 people

      2. The defense failed to object at key moments during Stormy’s testimony. They waved their right at those key moments. Sounds like the judge called out the defense’s incompetence. So what in the fuck are you bitching about, dumbass….. I see why the law firms all fired your ass.

        Like

      3. You would have a point if you ignore the fact that the defense filed a motion to exclude Daniels testimony. That is a form of an objection. So did they need to object twice?

        Liked by 2 people

      4. “So did they need to object twice?“

        It’s obvious the judge thinks they needed to……..and you’re no judge, enough said!

        Like

      5. If I were on Trump’s Legal Team I’d be thinking about an Expedited Appeal in the event of a guilty verdict. The best way of vindicating Trump’s rights at this point is to get any adverse judgement reversed BEFORE the election.

        After the election, this corrupt trial judge needs to be investigated up the yin yang.

        Liked by 2 people

      6. MG: The best way of vindicating Trump’s rights at this point is to get any adverse judgement reversed BEFORE the election.

        One better way of vindicating himself is to clear the 80-plus felonies through a jury of his peers. Why continue to run if you’re innocent

        Liked by 1 person

      7. All states [and the federal rules of evidence] prohibit the introduction of ‘bad character’ evidence —- prosecutors aren’t allowed to call witnesses to testify to ancient, un-charged acts merely to prejudice the jury. When a judge intentionally allows this kind of evidence he’s ignoring his oath of office and, in essence, directing the verdict.

        #BelieveMe,This’ActivistInRobes’Isn’tGonnaGetTheLastLaugh…

        Liked by 2 people

      8. MG: #BelieveMe,This’ActivistInRobes’Isn’tGonnaGetTheLastLaugh…

        The voters will…..disappointment awaits you……I am going to get the last laugh!

        Like

      10. Like Trump said back in 2020 his own poll numbers had him beating Biden at the ballot box by a large margin…….we all know that turned out to be the opposite….. disappointment awaits you again…..

        Like

      11. Plow Horse –The defense made a motion to disallow Daniels’ testimony in total —that represents a continuing objection for purposes of appeal….beyond that they objected several times during her testimony….and beyond that they made a motion for a mistrial based on their earlier motion to disallow purely prejudicial testimony —- they’ve done all they need to do to “preserve’ this issue on appeal….. [and the denial of their mistrial motion is another basis for appeal]….

        Like

      12. Indirectly, I am glad to see Trump’s moral character is also on trial. He’s not a decent person.

        Like

      13. As if Joe is a decent person. A guy who denied the existence of his own granddaughter. And once it became well know, he and Jill abandoned a decades old tradition of hanging Christmas stockings just so they wouldn’t look bad for not hanging one for Navy.

        A guy who walks up to a mic and thinks playing Despacito on his phone will win him points with Latinos. A guy who sets a piece of cheese at the border and dares migrants to come and get it without any regard for what a dangerous trek it is, not to mention the risk they expose themselves to with the coyotes & cartels! A guy who says “no one who has had 220K die on his watch should be President”, but ignores the fact that the number on HIS WATCH is more than TRIPLE that amount. (No matter what stupid, lame excuses you make for it.)

        Joe also collected his 10% from several of our adversaries via Hunter’s influence peddling. He is NOT a decent man and only a fool would claim otherwise. Many of his character deficiencies actually impact the American people!!

        Liked by 2 people

      14. MG, I am not going to be completely shocked if Dementia Joe wins. His 2020 supporters merely lie to themselves about all of the blood that is on their hands as a result of having voted for dementia, incompetence & weakness. They don’t truly care about human lives until it’s one of THEIR loves ones or it helps them achieve one of their political goals (Gaza, 2A, etc.).

        Liked by 1 person

      15. What fucking blood, details, or STFU! You say the same fucking shit over and over and over(stale playbook). Yet you have been asked numerous times to provide evidence to support your accusations. You lack the intellectual capacity to debate yourself out of a paper bag.

        Trump could win this election with ease but all his baggage will lead to another landslide at the ballot box. Biden is running the country and trump is running from the law, terrible optics for trump heading into the last 6 months of the general election. As I said, decency matters and trump is despicable

        Like

      16. Yes, So Cal —Gabby may get the last laugh…..

        #ButItWillBeOneOfThoseLaughsWhere….

        #…YouOpenYourMouthButNoSoundComesOut…

        Like

  4. This massive ‘footballers’ realignment’ stuff doesn’t seem to have dimmed college fans’ enthusiasm (as some predicted)

    Like

    Reply

    1. No, but the sheer amount of money being thrown at highschoolers and transfers has ended the “for the love of the game” concept….

      Like

      Reply

    1. I was just watching Alan Dershowitz [who, btw, knows both New York cases are “big jokes”] —he’s in his early 80’s and he’s sharp as a tack. Compare Biden looking blankly into cameras and saying “4 More Years…. Pause!” [in other words, pulling a Ron Burgundy & reading a fricking stage direction as though it’s part of the preceding speech] to Dershowitz saying “The gag order is prior restraint and is thus presumptively unconstitutional —- beyond that it’s a violation of the electorate’s right to hear from the leading presidential contender.”

      #JoeIsNotOnlyOld,He’sBrainDead

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. The idiots HAVE TO convince themselves that Trump’s cognitive decline is worse than Biden’s or else they’ll look even stupider voting for him this year than they did in 2020. The truth is it’s not even close. But the truth has never been their forte.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Trump tried to hide the payment to Stormy as a legal expense. Ha ha. Sorry. That dog won’t hunt.

    Like

    Reply

      1. Why not go to the FBI if it was extortion?……..(because Trump was buying her silence)

        Like

      2. Exactly, Gabby…..now find the statute that makes that a crime and you’re in business….

        Like

      3. I never said the act of paying the money was a crime…….The act is a moral crime that speaks volumes to the orange Cheetos character….and any decent woman would have divorced his sorry ass. 

        The public needs to know all the information that led to these indictments, including the infidelity that pushed this outcome. He should have kept it in his pants.

        Like

      4. “I never said it was a crime, but he must be held accountable and put in prison.”

        I give you the Village Idiot! LMAO

        Liked by 1 person

      5. You dumbass, the crime of extortion would have been committed by Stormy. More comprehension issues from the blog dunce. You took the bait and look like a fucking idiot.

        Like

      6. Lying again.

        Not only does she having reading comprehension issues with what others write. She also has comprehension issues with what she’s written! LMAO

        What a dumbass.

        Like

    2. An employee of Trump filled out the form. She associated the payment with Michael Cohen, a lawyer. Very reasonable to describe the payment as a legal expense since the payment was directed to Cohen. Should the form say “legal expense for preparation and execution of NDA to conceal sex with a porn star from my wife.” Apparently, the DA thinks so. If this were the case there would be no NDA because the disclosure on the form would nullify the purpose of the NDA.

      Anyway the statute of limitations ran on the false business records claim, a misdemeanor. So they need to show the business record was falsified to conceal a felony and they have not yet identified that felony. the FEC determined that the payment did not violate campaign finance laws and the New York DA has no authority to prosecute a federal election crime. What an absolute sham.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. On the other hand, Gabby is happy New York [of all places on God’s earth] is turning a criminal court into a Court of Inquisition….

        #TheUltraCowardlySupremeCourt…. [thruDeclaratoryJudgement]…

        #And/Or….

        #…TheEvenMoreCowardlyHouse[ByTurningOffThe$$$$]….

        #….CouldEndThisRightNow

        #…ButTheyWon’t

        Like

  7. -Seems if Stump can impress the idea that the “hush monies’ were at least in part spent on protecting him from a possible divorce he might be home free

    Like

    Reply

    1. That is the obvious inference inherent in all the testimony —-but will it matter to a crazy New York jury?

      #AndInTheEventOfAHungJury….

      #…ThisWasteOfCourtSpace&TimeWillStartOver….

      Like

      Reply

    2. Hope Hicks testified the other day that Trump approved of the payments because he thought the story would embarrass his family. Consequently, there is no violation of the campaign finance laws. It was a payment made with personal funds for a personal reason. This case should end in a directed verdict unless some other evidence is introduced to rebut that testimony.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. you keep putting your foot in your mouth……stop with the lies, it’s ridiculous.

        Like

      2. Sorry to disappoint, my friend —-Directed Verdicts come via the bench —–and there is ZERO chance this judge would ever [in a million years] direct a verdict for the defendant…

        #…He’sOnlyGotPutOnTheCaseToGetTrump….

        #…That’sWhyHeRefusedToRecuseHimself&DeniedTheMistrial

        Like

      4. …. the same “should” that applies to better signature verification on mail-in ballots, the availability of direct appeals to federal court by republican candidates prosecuted by dem D. A.’s in California or New York and improved vetting of “visitors’ at the southern border…..

        #SadSituation

        Like

  8. Special Note to Gabby —

    I notice you mentioned somewhere that Michael Cohen’s 2022 guilty plea should be used against Trump [or words to that effect].

    Did you know that Michael Cohen’s lawyer on that absurd plea deal was the infamous “fixer’ for the Clinton’s—–Lanny Davis? Lanny even said Cohen would never accept a pardon from Trump …cuz…. “he has too much honor.” [He he ha ha].

    Any case relying on the testimony of Michael Cohen is —-as Alan Dershowitz put it this morning —- “a big joke.”

    Like

    Reply

    1. We will let the jury decide if Cohen and his testimony is a big joke!

      He took a bullet for trump. What’s the saying, “Payback is a bitch”

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. Yes…I think the great Randy Quaid said that just before he flew headfirst into the Alien Mothership in “Independence Day”….

        Like

      2. P. S.

        I would SO prefer Randy Quaid to Joe Biden as my Commander in Chief……

        #…..AtLeastHeKnowsHowToParty

        Like

Leave a comment