FOOTBALL

Pick The USC-TCU Score

Oh yes, the game tonight.

Who will win? Who will play? Is D’Anton Lynn fired up?

OK, time to pick the score between the team’s and their missing star players.

22 thoughts on “Pick The USC-TCU Score”

    1. Hope and pray you’re right. Hard to believe a disheartened, abandoned defensive squad will hold a Sonny Dykes team to 17 —but it would be wonderful to see.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

    2. MODERATOR

      December 29, 2025 at 6:46 pm

      This comment is highly charged with inflammatory language and personal attacks, aimed at discrediting and vilifying the individual (Gabby) mentioned. It includes a combination of accusations, insults, and threats, which could be seen as an attempt to undermine her credibility and reputation in an online forum or discussion.

      Here’s a breakdown of some of the major elements and concerns:

      1. Name-Calling and Insults: The comment begins by listing several derogatory terms and aliases associated with the individual in question. The use of terms like “brain dead,” “vile,” “antisemitic,” “racist,” “cowardly,” and “Board Cancer” shows a clear intention to belittle and degrade Gabby. These labels are not based on any reasoned argument but are instead attempts to create a personal attack that dehumanizes the individual.
      2. Suggestions for ‘Improvement’: The commenter offers a list of suggestions about how Gabby could engage more “productively” or be “better received.” These suggestions may be framed as constructive, but they are undercut by the hostile language surrounding them. The points themselves, such as “drop the insults” and “respond to ideas, not people,” could have merit in the context of civil discourse, but they are presented in a tone that seems more about shaming rather than genuinely encouraging positive change.
      3. Personal Attacks and Doxxing: The comment accuses Gabby of engaging in severe behavior like “doxxing” (sharing personal information without consent), making threats, and using violent or obscene language. Whether or not these accusations are true, the focus on these behaviors rather than addressing any specific ideas or arguments makes the comment feel more like a personal vendetta.
      4. Tone of Aggression: The comment itself is filled with aggressive, provocative language aimed at provoking a reaction. Calling someone “sociopathic” or suggesting they need “psychiatric evaluation” and “deprogramming” is not only insulting but also highly unproductive in terms of any meaningful dialogue. This kind of language is likely to escalate conflict rather than foster understanding or resolution.
      5. Hyperbolic and Disrespectful Language: The comment’s exaggeration of Gabby’s actions (“25-year streak,” “flood it with her full mooner political opinions,” etc.) serves to magnify perceived faults in a way that borders on hyperbole. The use of extreme language like “animal defecation videos” is also an attempt to sensationalize and vilify without providing concrete evidence or examples that support the claim.
      6. Divisiveness: There’s a strong political and ideological undercurrent throughout the comment, particularly the mention of “sociopathic Democrat Party opinions.” This comment seems to frame political disagreements as personal attacks, reinforcing a divide rather than seeking to address the actual issues or ideas Gabby may be advocating for. This kind of divisiveness can derail conversations and deepen rifts between people with different views.

      Key Issues:

      • Ad Hominem Attacks: The primary approach of this comment is attacking the character and personal traits of Gabby rather than focusing on her arguments or actions in a reasonable way.
      • No Constructive Dialogue: The suggestions for improvement are buried under layers of hostility, making them seem more like insults than advice.
      • Escalation, Not Resolution: Rather than encouraging respectful discussion or resolution of conflict, the comment seeks to escalate the situation by framing Gabby as a villain in a highly exaggerated manner.
      • Personal and Political Bias: The comment includes politically charged language that may alienate readers rather than promote productive discussion.

      Conclusion:

      This comment is an example of highly aggressive online discourse that prioritizes personal attacks over constructive dialogue. While some of the suggestions could have been made in a more respectful and neutral tone, the overall approach is inflammatory and divisive. It reflects the challenges of engaging in online communities where emotions can run high and individuals resort to hostile language when disagreements arise. For healthy discourse, it’s important to focus on ideas, maintain a respectful tone, and avoid dehumanizing language.

      Like

      Reply

      2. KAM: Based on what’s shown in the thread, Cowardly Gabby could come across as nicer (and be better received) by changing how she engages, not just what she believes. Some practical ways:

        1. Drop the insults and name-calling
        Personal attacks, slurs, violent threats, doxxing posters, naming their home address and wife’s name and mocking language instantly shut down any chance of goodwill. Even people who might agree with her points will tune out once it turns hostile.

        2. Respond to ideas, not people
        Instead of attacking someone’s character (“meet me in Barstow,” etc.), focus on the argument itself. For example: criticize a policy, statistic, or sports take—without attacking the person posting it.

        3. Stop re-litigating old posts
        Digging up months-old comments about fighting posters in Barstow  to shame others keeps conflict alive. Letting old arguments stay in the past makes interactions feel less vindictive.

        4. Tone down repetition and spamming
        Posting the same accusations or threats of violence, threatening to show up at their place of residence  or using hundreds of aliases over and over reads as harassment, not debate. Fewer, calmer posts would go a long way.

        5. Change your tone

        A neutral or friendly tone matters more than “winning.” Even disagreeing politely (“We’ll have to agree to disagree” without threatening to attack them) changes how people perceive you.

        6. Model the behavior you want back
        If  Cowardly Gabby wants respect, she has to show it first. She needs psychiatric help.

        DON: Bottom line:
        Cowardly Gabby needs institutionalization to be nicer—less hostility, more restraint, less animal d e f e ca t i o n videos, less doxxing and stalking and insulting the wives of posters here  and a focus on discussion instead of domination. She is unwelcome here.

        Like

  2. Literally NO ONE has seen today’s teams on the field —– we are seeing several second stringers on the field for the first time —– games like this go to the better coach [oh, phuck]!

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

      1. Simple: He promised himself he was gonna triple the number of “L’s” on his coaching record when he left Oregon….

        #He’sOnHisWay

        Liked by 3 people

Leave a comment