Notes: We Already Have A USC-UCLA Prediction

The Los Angeles Times has predicted the outcome for each UCLA game this season and picks the Bruins to defeat USC.

  • Did you see USC is asking fans to submit questions to Lincoln Riley? He will answer one per week. How about asking him when he will commit to playing Notre Dame?

You can submit question on this form.

18 thoughts on “Notes: We Already Have A USC-UCLA Prediction

  1. Question: At what point would you admit you haven’t met expectations and walk away without holding USC to the buyout clause?

    Like

      1. KAM: Cowardly Sparrow Gabby actually defends the corruption of the Mainstream Moderate Democrat Annenberg Foundation doling out $100 million to any Democrat grievance money laundering group instead of the victims of the Pacific Palisades and Altadena fires!

        DON: She is completely without a sense of shame.

        Like

      2. He absolutely has you on this one Sparrow. The Annenberg Foundation misdirected funds from fire victims to left wing causes. You can’t defend that action.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. KAM: ….to the last penny. Look how shameless I am with my book tour and getting the Democrat Party to pay off my $20 million campaign debt!

      DON: You and Riley Coyote are two of a kind.

      Like

  2. That’s not quite correct. The beat writer for ucla said he thought ucla would beat SC, but the SC beat writer said the opposite

    Like

    1. Banned? There are no rules. No one thinks the rules apply to them.

      Trump is trying to ban flag burning. But a lot of the fools cheering for that fly those Blue Line and Red Line flags, which are against U.S. Flag Code and also disrespectful. Flag Code states quite clearly that Old Glory shall be red, white & blue. Anything else is a bastardization of the flag, (including the USC version that is Cardinal & Gold).

      Many U.S. companies put a flag on their company apparel, which is also against flag code and disrespectful. But they won’t admit that because once again, the rules only apply to the other people!

      We have become a country of hypocrites.

      Like

    1. Right Rusoviet. Folt was opposed to allowing white, heterosexual males with high GPAs and SAT scores into the university. No way the genius “BIG Balls” would be admitted. I think white males now account for 28% of the student population. Many more women than men. Stanford has gone even more woke. 8% of the admittee in there recent class were white males. 70 applicants with perfect SAT scores were denied admittance. We are looking at the suicide of a nation. And Folt contributed to it. We have a Board of Trustees that is asleep at the switch. How is it that dumber students are a good thing for a university?

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Sparrow Calypso Cancel reply