What would it take for USC to have a practice without recruits present?
A lot more than the coronavirus, obviously.
I understand why recruits are allowed even with the current ban on spectators. But is it much different than allowing 100 people at practice?
Like I said, recruits and donors are the top priorities.
InsideUSC with Scott Wolf 
“Like I said, recruits and donors are the top priorities.”
Scottie, I suspect that is the way it works almost everywhere else. Not just a USC thing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You mean there are anti-science educrats pretending that recruits and boosters have special Red China Virus immunity everywhere?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was wondering the same thing, but then again, the USC administration are the biggest hypocrites in the history of any University. The fact that they cherry-pick who they want at practice, then use the Corona virus as to why nobody else can watch spring practice is just another example. I’m still waiting for the LA Times to break a story as to why C.L. Max Nikias is still employed by the school, and has his own private office.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Smaller crowds, less chance of having a large outbreak.
101
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michigan just cancelled their Spring Game. A Seria A player just tested positive for the virus.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is probably our fault too if you listen to wolf or fan boy…
LikeLike
Don’t you have experience with this, blogger? Weren’t you banned from practices during the Tenure of Monte’s Son?
#ThatOneTimeWhenWolfWasExiledTemporarily
#WhichIsWorse-BeingInfectedWithWolf’sSnarkinessOrTheCoronaVirus?
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brainless rahrah-itis is much worse.
LikeLike