USC Averaged Only 5 Points In 3rd Quarter

According to SportsPac12, USC averaged only 5.4 points in the third quarter last season. That ranked 10th among Pac-12 schools.
Sam Darnold, Ronald Jones and Co. and USC averaged 5.4 points?
That means someone was making halftime adjustments: the other team.

The full list:

1. Washington, 10.1

2. Arizona, 9.8

3. UCLA, 8.5

4. ASU, 8.1

5. Stanford, 7.3

6. Colorado, 6.8

7. Cal, 6.7

8. Utah, 6.5

9. WSU, 5.5

10. USC, 5.4

11. OSU, 4.4

12. Oregon, 4.0

 

UPDATED: Sports Pac 12 noted later that USC averaged 10.4 points in the fourth quarter, which was the best in the Pac-12 Conference. What do I attribute that to? Sam Darnold’s fourth-quarter heroics, which often came more from free-lancing than a set philosophy from play-calling.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “USC Averaged Only 5 Points In 3rd Quarter

  1. So when they scored points, it was all due to Sam. When they didn’t score points, it had nothing to do with Sam. Stop Sam-goggling. He left the program, already…. Get back to your JT Daniels bashing.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You’re missing the big, overarching point, Lamont. If Clay were a master strategist (like Mike Leach), USC would’ve roared out of the halftime locker room and scored 5.5 points in the third quarter —-instead of a measly 5.4.

      Like

      1. This is the most meaningless stat ever and it in no way provides any proof of the conclusions proffered by Mr. Wolfe. First, USC outscored or tied almost everyone that they played in the third quarter. Second, if you take the second Stanford and bowl games out (which I presume they did) then USC outscored their opposition. Third, it does not account for who had the ball first at the start of the second half. Fourth, it does not account for turnovers (including Darnold’s). I could go on and on about how stupid these conclusions are but it seems pointless. The only conclusions you can make are that this data provides no valuable information and that using it to credit Sam or blame Helton is done by agenda and not analysis.

        Liked by 2 people

    2. I was thinking the same thing. When its good, Sam’s responsible, when its bad, Helton/Coaching staff/Administration is responsible.

      Like

      1. I thought ALL 21st century debate proceeded via agenda, and not analysis, BarneFife.
        #It’sSoMuchEasier

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.