Some Quick Thoughts On USC Scandal

How many internal investigations does USC have going right now? I’ve lost count.

I can’t tell you how many USC coaches are amused over today’s news. Donna Heinel was not a popular figure within the athletic dept.

A USC administrator tells me Jovan Vavic makes somewhere in the neighborhood $300,000-400,000 per year. So he could make a pretty good living without taking bribes.

Wake Forest women’s volleyball coach Bill Ferguson, who used to be the USC men’s volleyball coach, was also indicted. Wake Forest placed Ferguson on administrative leave. USC has not done anything with Vavic yet.

Did someone pull Lynn Swann off the golf course?

Things are so wild that there was a rumor today a coach got arrested at the swimming pool.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Some Quick Thoughts On USC Scandal

  1. …as tickled as a pig in…
    But whose the pig?
    Is there any chance that this is really just George Lucas making a Jar-Jar Binks (as USC potentate) feature film?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. “Did someone pull Lynn Swann off the golf course?”

    And therein lies Lynn Swann’s strategy for avoiding prosecution…

    “I had no clue of what was happening at USC and within it’s athletic dept. because I was always away from campus playing golf, there’s video proof of that”

    Liked by 4 people

    1. I realize you’re being facetious, tebow —-but that’s not really a defense. Intentionally insulating oneself from one’s responsibilities doesn’t cut it.
      You know, I always wondered how Helton, Haden, Swann, etc. happened.
      Now, it’s becoming clear: For the last decade or so, USC has been looking for people like that. Helton or Swann are historical accidents. But the TYPE is no accident.
      #NoOneWithAnyGutsNeedApply

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes (see, e.g., Fillmore, Pierce, and Buchanan, as U.S. presidents in the 1850s)

        So you’re saying the Steve Martin defense (“I forgot armed robbery was illegal…”) from “Comedy Isn’t Pretty” won’t work?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Ha! And “I forgot I was in charge” won’t work either……
        #ThereIsSuchAThingAsWillfulNeglect

        Like

      3. Yeah…from what I’ve read, we shouldn’t be looking for Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, and Roosevelt, any time soon, since it appears that the vast amount of concentrated talent in SoCal intersecting with the accidental hiring of a Jones or McKay or Carroll is more historical accident…but for crying out loud…can’t we have a power projecting Leonid mixed in now to offset our run of Yuri, Konstantin, and Mikhail?

        Liked by 1 person

      4. James —You know what’s really funny? I bet you on Friday Scott was thinking, “Crap. Semester break! What am I going to use to generate controversy for a whole week?!”
        #USCAdministrationDeliversAgain
        P.S.
        I love Wanda’s defense —“Not to worry! It’s not USC —it’s only the people working for USC!”

        Liked by 1 person

      5. As always “You got that right…sure…got that right” Wolfie benefiting from our own version of the ‘Old Travelling Jones’ once again…thinking of the Jar-Jar Binks theory…some though he might pop up as the new arch villain in the Disney version of SW (hmm…and those initials accidentally just typed)…perhaps Wolfie is really the Randall Flagg-like Chair of the BOT?

        Liked by 1 person

      6. P.P.S.
        Wanda Austin: “I want to assure all USC friends & alums that the statue of Tommy Trojan was not aware of or involved in these illegal activities in any way, shape or form….. this illicit conduct was thankfully restricted to high ranking employees only”

        Liked by 1 person

      7. Counselor Guarino,

        Question: Will Pat Haden be looked at with the problem at USC? Can he go to jail with the scandal that probably happened under his watch? Can Swann go to jail as well?

        Thank you.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Didn’t the illustrious la Presidentè state that SC was a VICTIM?
      Translated: SC didn’t benefit or receive compensation.
      You mean to tell me they did this for FREE?
      Ah, come on.

      Like

      1. CAL75,
        I can understand your point of view. But my thinking is, the AD Heinel had final say on who was receiving the scholi, then SC and Haden/Swann were trusting her and did not have work verified and scruntized. LIke Wolf says, she had her own fiefdom or mafia with no one asking questions.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.