Did you know 19 percent of USC’s entering freshman class in 2017-18 were legacy admissions?
A “legacy admission” is an applicant whose parents or siblings went to USC. That’s a pretty high figure when you consider USC accepted only 16 percent of its applicants that year.
What we really want to know is how many applicants were related to donors. That’s where the real influence is at USC.
Give the TV show, “The Simpsons” some credit. They predicted Dr. Dre would have a college building.

The SC legacy enrollment number is small relative to the Ivies. Harvard is 30 percent legacy or more.
These are all private universities. They admit those whom they think will contribute to enhancing the future value of the institution, whether that is through donations, intellectual contributions, etc.
Not saying it is good or bad, just that is the name of the game among private universities.
LikeLike
so what?
I think it is a positive; alumni should want their kids to attend their alma mater and I think it is great the kids have some loyalty and tradition in their lives and the school should feel that way also…so there!!!
LikeLike
So what? If it truly impacts a school it will ‘pan out’
Beats what bel-air tech was ‘found out’ 20+ years ago with their using donations for admission to a ‘public university’…that great cartoon the LA Times ran of a serpent with the letters ‘ucla’ on its’ skin and hissing ‘It’s who you know that counts!”
LikeLike
As usual, Commie Lush is full of piss vodka, farting loudly and Ripple and Puke hallucinating.
Fact:
UCLA 34 – bozo u 27
Ding goes the Vic Bell!!
LikeLike
As an outsider to the university, I understand that the university needs donors, funding, and an endowment. If that money helps some underprivileged kid attend the school, the money was put to good use. I think the scandal doesnt represent the majority of applicants and those who were caught, will be prosecuted………………………. I hope.
LikeLiked by 3 people
No idea how you found that Scott but that ios a great find!
LikeLiked by 1 person